Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2% regression in memory.dual_browser_test at 1525809855:1525819651 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 9 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947003420890493056
,
May 9 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: monochrome-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : memory.dual_browser_test Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/on_webview/google_science To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=google.science memory.dual_browser_test More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947003420890493056 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 7
This regression has been open for half a year. It's not very actionable and the regression has been in all Chrome user's hands for months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 9 2018