Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13%-43% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1525443931:1525456403 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 8 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947093797853292688
,
May 8 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_chrome/browse_chrome_newtab Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.chrome.newtab system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947093797853292688 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 1 2018
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 8 2018