Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
[wifi_atten_perf] [Eve]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 06,44 & 153 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome OS Version: <From about:version: Platform R67-10575.17.0> Chrome OS Platform: <Eve <b>Network info: <network, encryption type, router model (if known)></b> Please specify Cr-* of the system to which this bug/feature applies (add the label below). On M67, We see low TCP TX throughput on Eve for channel 01, 44 and 153 compared to builds from M66 Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screen shot or log if possible. Logs link below, M67 - https://storage.googleapis.com/chromiumos-test-logs/M67_Reports/ELM_AttenPerf_67.tar.gz M66-https://storage.googleapis.com/chromiumos-test-logs/M67_Reports/Eve_Atten_Perf_run2_R66.tar.gz M66- Rerun https://storage.googleapis.com/chromiumos-test-logs/M67_Reports/eve_66_atten_perf.tar.gz For graphics-related bugs, please copy/paste the contents of the about:gpu page at the end of this report.
,
May 9 2018
,
May 9 2018
,
May 10 2018
From your linked data M67 TCP tx looks better than M66. Can you re-check / confirm?
atten058_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=195.09+-2.67
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=196.69+-0.96
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=198.53+-0.78
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=200.47+-0.56
atten062_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=170.39+-37.25
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=171.82+-34.94
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=199.44+-0.39
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=200.25+-0.77
atten066_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=195.99+-2.32
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=165.48+-42.61
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=200.78+-1.34
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=198.84+-0.69
atten070_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=195.31+-2.14
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=196.25+-1.74
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=199.63+-0.39
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=196.56+-3.03
atten074_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=195.66+-2.95
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=195.71+-2.88
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=142.04+-4.12
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=137.50+-4.12
atten078_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=194.84+-1.14
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=192.39+-2.98
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=110.51+-0.74
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=94.91+-2.70
atten082_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=145.62+-15.81
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=140.35+-3.87
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=63.71+-1.55
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=58.68+-1.22
atten086_signal
ch001_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=104.77+-7.51
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=99.71+-2.39
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=59.38+-0.89
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=56.39+-1.59
Below is M66 TCP TX data
atten058_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=173.24+-0.97
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=188.65+-0.98
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten058_throughput{perf}=187.86+-1.37
atten062_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=71.26+-17.74
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=187.91+-0.77
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten062_throughput{perf}=188.18+-0.23
atten066_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=154.57+-49.58
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=189.24+-0.62
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten066_throughput{perf}=189.08+-0.25
atten070_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=170.55+-4.81
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=190.42+-0.76
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten070_throughput{perf}=185.40+-1.47
atten074_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=163.82+-2.98
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=170.88+-1.55
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten074_throughput{perf}=118.52+-0.59
atten078_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=136.22+-1.93
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=115.95+-0.68
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten078_throughput{perf}=79.01+-1.47
atten082_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=114.09+-1.64
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=76.40+-0.61
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten082_throughput{perf}=58.10+-0.47
atten086_signal
ch006_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=75.71+-1.07
ch044_modeHT40p_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=55.83+-0.80
ch153_modeHT40m_none_tcp_tx_atten086_throughput{perf}=24.35+-1.43
,
May 10 2018
The M67 link is incorrect. It is pointing to Elm data. The correct link for atten perf results on M67 for Eve is https://storage.googleapis.com/chromiumos-test-logs/M67_Reports/Eve_Attenperf.tar.gz Comparison details between M67 and M66. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sEqGKFwGFjkVTXrS5JReEXFtcJCOQUkQcBHTUF1TtAA/edit?usp=sharing
,
Jan 15
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by aashuto...@chromium.org
, May 7 2018