Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
41.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1525340686:1525380319 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 4 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947447791769014480
,
May 5 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:java_heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/load_games/load_games_bubbles Change : 18.09% | 4337903.2381 -> 5122472.7619 Revision Result N android-chrome@a8d6449870 4337903 +- 971262 21 good android-chrome@3fea53a776 5122473 +- 137313 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.bubbles system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947447791769014480 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 1 2018
Bisect can't repro, looks like a blip? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 4 2018