Nested iframe content is not rendered
Reported by
emc...@gmail.com,
May 4 2018
|
||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/65.0.3325.181 Safari/537.36 OPR/52.0.2871.99 Steps to reproduce the problem: The content of the nested iframe is not rendered, although the content is in the OM. This only happens in Chrome. The content is rendered in FireFox 59.0.3 (64-bit) and Opera 52.0.2871.99 What is the expected behavior? The content of the nested iframe to be rendered What went wrong? The content of the nested iframe is not rendered, although the content is in the OM. This only happens in Chrome. The content is rendered in FireFox 59.0.3 (64-bit) and Opera 52.0.2871.99 Did this work before? Yes 65.0.3325.181 Does this work in other browsers? N/A Chrome version: 65.0.3325.181 Channel: n/a OS Version: 10.0 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 29.0 r0
,
May 6 2018
,
May 7 2018
reporter@ - Thanks for filing the issue...!! Could you please provide a sample test file/url to test the issue from TE-end. This will help us in triaging the issue further. Thanks...!!
,
May 8 2018
The attached zip file contains a static test with which the issue is reproduced. Open index.html Scroll all the way to the bottom Click Upload File(s) button The content of the iframe is loaded into the dom, but it is not visible.
,
May 8 2018
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
May 9 2018
Able to reproduce the issue on Mac 10.13.3, win-10 and ubuntu 14.04 using chrome reported version #66.0.3359.139 but the same is not reproducible in the latest canary #68.0.3424.0. Reverse Bisect Information: ===================== Good build: 68.0.3409.0 Bad Build : 68.0.3406.0 Change Log URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/b7c35726b2d64cea420b700c0c0938bd0713d0ac..f87f441933cf81be2eb29a486c4180de8e1c8e03 From the above change log suspecting below change Change-Id: I3437d3933155960abfcbebd437ddb6cb606ea37e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1025329 pdr@ - Could you please check and merge the fix to M-67 if it is a valid candidate. Adding RBS label for M-67 as it seems to be a recent regression. Please feel free to remove the same if not appropriate. Thanks...!!
,
May 9 2018
emcy90, thanks for taking the time to file this. A fix was landed and the fix was merged to M67 which should go stable by the end of the month. This is tough to work around without avoiding position: fixed :/
,
May 9 2018
[Auto-generated comment by a script] We noticed that this issue is targeted for M-67; it appears the fix may have landed after branch point, meaning a merge might be required. Please confirm if a merge is required here - if so add Merge-Request-67 label, otherwise remove Merge-TBD label. Thanks.
,
May 9 2018
This was already merged. |
||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||
Comment 1 by emc...@gmail.com
, May 4 2018133 KB
133 KB View Download