Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2577.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1524802457:1525317877 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 4 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947466689492450064
,
May 4 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao Change : 2385.32% | 177899.0 -> 4421355.0 Suspected Commit Range 12 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/e80ef296fb0b839978fc7eef23fba567ba1d8e7e..b1d8c49e3c969c8b99cedc9df5ef8ff0af3ba755 Revision Result N android-chrome@069a782c20 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@f4ca9a80b7 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554232 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554266 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554276 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554277 --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554287 --- --- build failure android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554288 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554305 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@452ccfa0f7 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@0f6680b944 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@13da4d3a3f 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@bf9c45de3e 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@87acbefda8 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@061a8220c9 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8947466689492450064 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 1 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944889902051788512
,
Jun 1 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944889897338502064
,
Jun 2 2018
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wangxianzhu@chromium.org === Hi wangxianzhu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Xianzhu Wang Commit : 976fc1e074a07d78fc4ccb3ab2a9fbd20fd9ce69 Date : Fri Apr 27 03:05:06 2018 Subject: [SPv175+] Don't create a new chunk with different id and the same properties. Bisect Details Configuration: go-webview-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao Change : 2286.36% | 185474.333333 -> 4426086.16667 Revision Result N android-chrome@7efa2ba1f1 185474 +- 8812.33 6 good android-chrome@972eebff76 191163 +- 8812.33 6 good android-chrome@4e4cf7775f 185474 +- 8812.33 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1 188319 +- 9346.89 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554232 185474 +- 8812.33 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554266 188319 +- 9346.89 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554276 188319 +- 9346.89 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554279 185474 +- 8812.33 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554280 182630 +- 6966.76 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554281 4431775 +- 9346.89 6 bad <-- android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554282 4426086 +- 6966.76 6 bad android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554288 4423242 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554305 4428930 +- 8812.33 6 bad android-chrome@452ccfa0f7 4428930 +- 8812.33 6 bad android-chrome@0f6680b944 4428930 +- 8812.33 6 bad android-chrome@efed3974e3 4426086 +- 6966.76 6 bad android-chrome@d3db009934 4434619 +- 8812.33 6 bad android-chrome@061a8220c9 4426086 +- 6966.76 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944889902051788512 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 2 2018
,
Jun 2 2018
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wangxianzhu@chromium.org === Hi wangxianzhu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Xianzhu Wang Commit : 976fc1e074a07d78fc4ccb3ab2a9fbd20fd9ce69 Date : Fri Apr 27 03:05:06 2018 Subject: [SPv175+] Don't create a new chunk with different id and the same properties. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao Change : 2385.32% | 177899.0 -> 4421355.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@069a782c20 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@f4ca9a80b7 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554232 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554266 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554276 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554279 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554280 177899 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554281 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad <-- android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554282 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554288 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@5e7f0484c1,chromium@554305 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@452ccfa0f7 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@d3953c5ec8 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@13da4d3a3f 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@bf9c45de3e 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@87acbefda8 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad android-chrome@061a8220c9 4421355 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944889897338502064 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 2 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 4 2018