mus_browser_tests failing on chromium.memory/Linux Chromium OS ASan LSan Tests (1) |
|||||||
Issue descriptionFiled by sheriff-o-matic@appspot.gserviceaccount.com on behalf of mstensho@chromium.org mus_browser_tests failing on chromium.memory/Linux Chromium OS ASan LSan Tests (1) Builders failed on: - Linux Chromium OS ASan LSan Tests (1): https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.memory/builders/Linux%20Chromium%20OS%20ASan%20LSan%20Tests%20%281%29
,
Apr 19 2018
SamlTest.ScrapedMultiple is flaky; see e.g.: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.memory/builders/Linux%20Chromium%20OS%20ASan%20LSan%20Tests%20%281%29/builds/27104
,
Apr 19 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/e9a85aaacf84490c55e5e6d9677499dac1b49e77 commit e9a85aaacf84490c55e5e6d9677499dac1b49e77 Author: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@chromium.org> Date: Thu Apr 19 11:42:12 2018 Disable SamlTest.ScrapedMultiple due to flakiness. TBR=xiyuan@chromium.org Bug: 834703 Change-Id: Iac81e8e96411237ee761691cb3c569138a8d5aa5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1019140 Reviewed-by: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#551983} [modify] https://crrev.com/e9a85aaacf84490c55e5e6d9677499dac1b49e77/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/saml/saml_browsertest.cc
,
Apr 19 2018
,
Apr 19 2018
rkc@, could you help to find an owner for this since I probably would not be able to get this for a while? I am not sure why the test failed though. From the log, it seems that we have passed SamlAuth and user session is started: 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Apr/2018 02:33:43] "POST /SAMLAuth HTTP/1.1" 307 - [30537:30843:0419/023343.379664:WARNING:fake_gaia.cc(319)] Serving request /SSO 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Apr/2018 02:33:43] "POST /SSO?SAMLResponse=fake_response&RelayState=https%3A%2F%2Faccounts.google.com%3A42894%2FDummySAMLContinue HTTP/1.1" 307 - [30537:30843:0419/023343.568231:WARNING:fake_gaia.cc(319)] Serving request /DummySAMLContinue 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Apr/2018 02:33:43] "POST /DummySAMLContinue HTTP/1.1" 200 - ==> This shows that we hit Saml IdP page and passed the Saml auth. [30537:30537:0419/023343.895061:INFO:signin_screen_handler.cc(1473)] Login WebUI >> active: 0, source: gaia-signin [30537:30537:0419/023345.083797:INFO:signin_screen_handler.cc(1473)] Login WebUI >> active: 1, source: gaia-signin [30537:30537:0419/023345.667458:INFO:signin_screen_handler.cc(1473)] Login WebUI >> active: 0, source: gaia-signin [30537:30537:0419/023346.614968:INFO:signin_screen_handler.cc(1473)] Login WebUI >> active: 1, source: gaia-signin ==> Gaia screen hide and show twice because the test would show the password confirm screen and hide Gaia twice. [30537:30843:0419/023346.707957:WARNING:fake_gaia.cc(319)] Serving request /oauth2/v4/token 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Apr/2018 02:33:46] "POST /oauth2/v4/token HTTP/1.1" 200 - [30537:30537:0419/023346.730810:ERROR:gaia_auth_fetcher.cc(71)] Missing ID token on refresh token fetch response. [30537:30537:0419/023346.732096:ERROR:device_event_log_impl.cc(156)] [02:33:46.732] Login: cryptohome_util.cc:131 GetKeyDataEx failed with no GetKeyDataReply extension in reply. ==> The crypthome_util.cc log is from updating easy unlock keys after user sign-in. And this point, user session should be starting. And the test just waits for NOTIFICATION_SESSION_STARTED. Not sure why it would fail. Maybe because it is an ASAN bot and we exceeds the max allowed time out?
,
May 4 2018
There's a bunch of other tests in this file which were disabled on ASan/LSan - presumably, due to being too slow (e.g., SamlTest.ScrapedDynamic, SAMLEnrollmentTest.WithoutCredentialsPassingAPI). I think we should make SamlTest.ScrapedMultiple also disabled *only* in this configuration, instead of disabling it uniformly. It's a bit scary to lose the test coverage in this important area of SAML login.
,
Jun 18 2018
Issue 759291 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jan 17
(6 days ago)
,
Jan 17
(6 days ago)
|
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 Deleted