Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7%-172.2% regression in thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth at 549274:549473 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Project Member Reported by toyoshim@chromium.org, Apr 16 (3 days ago) | Back to list | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
Apr 16
(3 days ago)
,
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16fb6e7ac40000
Yesterday
(47 hours ago)
,
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16fb6e7ac40000 [SPv175+] Don't create OverflowClip if contents don't overflow by wangxianzhu@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/62abeca8161aedf25ee126d4bc63bd3cbeac4085 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Yesterday
(42 hours ago)
,
WontFix because: - Only one test (reddit) in the suite has regressed; - For the test, thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame and thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame are only a very small part of the total frame cpu usage; - The CL has more other benefits (memory, raster time). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Apr 16 (3 days ago)