chrome.contentSettings.microphone.set('incognito_session_only') crashes the browser
Reported by
cool...@gmail.com,
Apr 13 2018
|
|||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/59.0 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. install the attached extension. 2. open the chrome browser in the incognito mode. 3. navigate to chrome-extension://EXTENSION_ID/coolcmd.html What is the expected behavior? You should see the 'OK' string in the F12 console. What went wrong? The browser was crashed. Did this work before? N/A Does this work in other browsers? N/A Chrome version: 66.0.3359.66 (Официальная сборка) beta (64 бит) (cohort: Beta) Channel: beta OS Version: 6.1 (Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2) Flash Version: Tested in Chrome 49, 65, 66.
,
Apr 13 2018
,
Apr 14 2018
With this and 833061 issues, there is impossible to select audio output device in incognito mode.
,
Apr 15 2018
,
Apr 16 2018
Thanks for filing the issue! Checked the issue on reported chrome version 66.0.3359.66 using Windows 10 with the below mentioned steps. 1. Launched chrome 2. Installed the attached extension. 3. Allowed the extension to run in incognito mode. 3. Opened Incognito window. 4. Navigated to chrome-extension://EXTENSION_ID/coolcmd.html We didn't observe any crash rather the extension was blocked. Attaching the screen shot of the same. @Reporter: Could you please have a look at the screen shot and let us know if we have missed anything in the process. Any further inputs from your end may be helpful.
,
Apr 16 2018
@vamshi, you should replace EXTENSION_ID with real extension ID. You can see this ID in chrome://extensions/.
,
Apr 16 2018
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Apr 17 2018
Able to reproduce this issue on reported version 66.0.3359.66, on latest canary 68.0.3397.0 using Windows 10, Mac 10.13.3 and Ubuntu 14.04. i.e; Crash is seen on opening chrome-extension://EXTENSION_ID/coolcmd.html (replaced with real extension id) in Incognito mode This issue is seen from M-60. Hence considering this issue as Non-Regression and marking as Untriaged. Thanks!
,
Apr 17 2018
It looks like the crash is caused by ContentSettingsService being null in incognito mode: https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_api.cc?l=272&rcl=b891d95d59d0d2e98dc1d4683f91089eca2da408 If I add kServiceRedirectedInIncognito = true to ContentSettingsService, the crash disappears but I don't know if it would work correctly. This issue seems to be indepentend of the one you mentionend in https://crbug.com/833061#c4 . I don't think any of these issues are caused by the inheritance change but I guess before, you didn't have to worry about incognito permission if you set the regular mode permission.
,
Apr 20 2018
,
May 11 2018
[Extensions Triage]: bauerb@: Can you help triage/own this?
,
May 14 2018
Can someone from the privacy team own this? I have not been on privacy in ~6 years :) I probably wouldn't redirect ContentSettingsService in all cases, but just in this instance, as it is specific to split mode. coolcmd@, sindhu.chelamcherla@, does either of you have a crash ID from chrome://crashes?
,
May 14 2018
Идентификатор загруженного отчета о сбоях: bc9753c9d4f983c6. Локальный идентификатор сбоя: 3ec4b72f-5453-4713-bcdd-f2c959c9c7ce.
,
May 14 2018
Thanks! Stack trace: Thread 0 (id: 668) CRASHED [EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ @ 0x00000010 ] MAGIC SIGNATURE THREAD 0x000007feed4712d4 (chrome.dll -content_settings_api.cc:271 ) extensions::ContentSettingsContentSettingSetFunction::Run() 0x000007feebe5be57 (chrome.dll -extension_function.cc:451 ) ExtensionFunction::RunWithValidation() 0x000007feebe5d3c6 (chrome.dll -extension_function_dispatcher.cc:486 ) extensions::ExtensionFunctionDispatcher::DispatchWithCallbackInternal(ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params const &,content::RenderFrameHost *,int,base::RepeatingCallback<void > const &) 0x000007feebe5cfc9 (chrome.dll -extension_function_dispatcher.cc:380 ) extensions::ExtensionFunctionDispatcher::Dispatch(ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params const &,content::RenderFrameHost *,int) 0x000007feebe72a08 (chrome.dll -ipc_message_templates.h:146 ) IPC::MessageT<ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Meta,std::tuple<ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params>,void>::Dispatch<extensions::ExtensionWebContentsObserver,extensions::ExtensionWebContentsObserver,content::RenderFrameHost,void (extensions::ExtensionWebContentsObserver::*)(content::RenderFrameHost *, const ExtensionHostMsg_Request_Params &)> 0x000007feeb598b77 (chrome.dll -extension_web_contents_observer.cc:225 ) extensions::ExtensionWebContentsObserver::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const &,content::RenderFrameHost *) 0x000007feeb598abe (chrome.dll -chrome_extension_web_contents_observer.cc:106 ) extensions::ChromeExtensionWebContentsObserver::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const &,content::RenderFrameHost *) 0x000007feeb598118 (chrome.dll -web_contents_impl.cc:785 ) content::WebContentsImpl::OnMessageReceived(content::RenderFrameHostImpl *,IPC::Message const &) 0x000007feeb59701b (chrome.dll -render_frame_host_impl.cc:923 ) content::RenderFrameHostImpl::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const &) 0x000007feeb596e6c (chrome.dll -render_process_host_impl.cc:3072 ) content::RenderProcessHostImpl::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const &) 0x000007feeb596d52 (chrome.dll -ipc_channel_proxy.cc:320 ) IPC::ChannelProxy::Context::OnDispatchMessage(IPC::Message const &) 0x000007feeaf07334 (chrome.dll -task_annotator.cc:101 ) base::debug::TaskAnnotator::RunTask(char const *,base::PendingTask *) [...] Actually, I think this used to get the ContentSettingsStore from ExtensionPrefs, which redirected to the regular profile from incognito (see https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d31e2484add25de2f07a69773d319ebc86210369^/extensions/browser/extension_prefs_factory.cc#58), so doing that for ContentSettingsService should be fine. Also +rockot, who wrote the CL to extract ContentSettingsService.
,
May 14 2018
I take it.
,
May 14 2018
Issue 842632 has been merged into this issue.
,
May 15 2018
bauerb@, redevlin.cronin@, I checked the code and when in (1), ContentSettingsService is requested, the request finally reaches BrowserContextKeyedServiceFactory::GetBrowserContextToUse which returns nullptr for incognito profiles. While the request is valid in this case (we are storing the content settings in incognito for incognito), do you have any comments on what is wrong? Would you suggest that I follow the path on why this service is not created and returned, or we should get the service somehow else? (1) https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_api.cc?rcl=b891d95d59d0d2e98dc1d4683f91089eca2da408&l=272
,
May 15 2018
Right, originally the ContentSettingsStore was in ExtensionPrefs, which redirected to the regular profile when requested for an incognito profile. When the ContentSettingsService was extracted, it got the default behavior instead, which is not to have a service at all for an incognito profile. That is not what we want though, because the code in ContentSettingsContentSettingSetFunction already handles incognito profiles in the correct way, so replicating the behavior of ExtensionPrefs is the right thing to do.
,
May 25 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6 commit 665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6 Author: Ramin Halavati <rhalavati@chromium.org> Date: Fri May 25 08:48:48 2018 Update ContentSettingsService access to incognito profile. ContentSettingsService handles incognito mode requests internally, so a flag is set to redirect incognito mode requests to the original profile. Also, in Set Content Settings API, incorrect use of include_incognito() function instead of IsIncognitoEnabled() is corrected. Two tests are added to check that all settings written in incognito are applied and do not affect regular mode, and incognito settings cannot be modified from regular mode. Bug: 832697 Bug: 845845 Change-Id: I7fe259af6a6cbc030483ffac445bdef4b972c7cf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1061853 Commit-Queue: Ramin Halavati <rhalavati@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Devlin <rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bernhard Bauer <bauerb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#561811} [modify] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_api.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_apitest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_service.h [add] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/manifest.json [add] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.html [add] https://crrev.com/665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.js
,
May 25 2018
The above CL should fix the issue.
,
May 25 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/05154177a10f28872ef365a0f8ae0a5630d1519e commit 05154177a10f28872ef365a0f8ae0a5630d1519e Author: Findit <findit-for-me@appspot.gserviceaccount.com> Date: Fri May 25 11:18:47 2018 Revert "Update ContentSettingsService access to incognito profile." This reverts commit 665ceb412fe9a28269c2fcb31115f27aee66ffd6. Reason for revert: Findit (https://goo.gl/kROfz5) identified CL at revision 561811 as the culprit for failures in the build cycles as shown on: https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/culprit?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVyRAsSDVdmU3VzcGVjdGVkQ0wiMWNocm9taXVtLzY2NWNlYjQxMmZlOWEyODI2OWMyZmNiMzExMTVmMjdhZWU2NmZmZDYM Sample Failed Build: https://ci.chromium.org/buildbot/chromium.win/Win7%20Tests%20%28dbg%29%281%29/69248 Sample Failed Step: browser_tests Original change's description: > Update ContentSettingsService access to incognito profile. > > ContentSettingsService handles incognito mode requests internally, so > a flag is set to redirect incognito mode requests to the original > profile. > Also, in Set Content Settings API, incorrect use of include_incognito() > function instead of IsIncognitoEnabled() is corrected. > Two tests are added to check that all settings written in incognito > are applied and do not affect regular mode, and incognito settings > cannot be modified from regular mode. > > Bug: 832697 > Bug: 845845 > Change-Id: I7fe259af6a6cbc030483ffac445bdef4b972c7cf > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1061853 > Commit-Queue: Ramin Halavati <rhalavati@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Devlin <rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Bernhard Bauer <bauerb@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#561811} Change-Id: Iaba120a3b8107c9dddbf2826b72e5e4567ee3a37 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: 845845 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1073088 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#561826} [modify] https://crrev.com/05154177a10f28872ef365a0f8ae0a5630d1519e/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_api.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/05154177a10f28872ef365a0f8ae0a5630d1519e/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_apitest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/05154177a10f28872ef365a0f8ae0a5630d1519e/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_service.h [delete] https://crrev.com/5bc9ec5d869f9b6a1fa3bb99022216f9db850fe0/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/manifest.json [delete] https://crrev.com/5bc9ec5d869f9b6a1fa3bb99022216f9db850fe0/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.html [delete] https://crrev.com/5bc9ec5d869f9b6a1fa3bb99022216f9db850fe0/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.js
,
May 30 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac commit d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac Author: Ramin Halavati <rhalavati@chromium.org> Date: Wed May 30 14:49:01 2018 Update ContentSettingsService access to incognito profile. ContentSettingsService handles incognito mode requests internally, so a flag is set to redirect incognito mode requests to the original profile. Also, in Set Content Settings API, incorrect use of include_incognito() function instead of IsIncognitoEnabled() is corrected. Two tests are added to check that all settings written in incognito are applied and do not affect regular mode, and incognito settings cannot be modified from regular mode. Bug: 832697 Bug: 845845 Change-Id: I6d65f824e3e3ca2fbd218ed0bf5af1ddc15c87ef Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1061853 Commit-Queue: Ramin Halavati <rhalavati@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Devlin <rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bernhard Bauer <bauerb@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#561811} Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1074651 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#562817} [modify] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_api.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_apitest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/browser/extensions/api/content_settings/content_settings_service.h [modify] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/browser/extensions/extension_apitest.h [add] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/manifest.json [add] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.html [add] https://crrev.com/d9732ad00f8dd2564a6283a67156697cfe85dbac/chrome/test/data/extensions/api_test/content_settings/incognitoisolation/test.js
,
Jun 1 2018
|
|||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||
Comment 1 by cool...@gmail.com
, Apr 13 2018