New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 830693 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 830825
Owner:
Closed: Apr 2018
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

7.5%-722.9% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 548424:548558

Project Member Reported by primiano@chromium.org, Apr 9 2018

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=830693

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=47d5abb3189fbee4f32fe71cb884ce49e720ef30ce4c47867a47e94eaffe6b47


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 10 2018

Cc: klausw@chromium.org rkaplow@chromium.org bajones@chromium.org vollick@chromium.org pmonette@chromium.org mbarbe...@chromium.org billorr@chromium.org
Owner: klausw@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found significant differences after each of 3 commits.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12fb45b4c40000

Adding fieldtrial config for the IncompatibleApplicationsWarning feature by pmonette@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/7a86e22e588d7941bde54bdb4a8c58c23e502836

Add SubmitFrameMissing mojo call for WebVR/WebXR by klausw@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/f5bbb138786c2236059c0fa28eaecf1e9f1d4a9e

Revert "Add SubmitFrameMissing mojo call for WebVR/WebXR" by klausw@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/4029d625bb7290835ef25c56b12275f6f2294bcf

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Comment 4 by klausw@chromium.org, Apr 16 2018

Mergedinto: 830825
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
My two changes were a no-op (apply and revert immediately), this looks like another instance of the regression pinpointed to pmonette's change.

Sign in to add a comment