CHECK failure: context_result != gpu::ContextResult::kFatalFailure in layouttest_support.cc |
|||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6528309027143680 Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer Job Type: linux_msan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: context_result != gpu::ContextResult::kFatalFailure in layouttest_support.cc content::LayoutTestDependenciesImpl::CreateDisplayOutputSurface content::LayoutTestDependenciesImpl::CreateDisplayOutputSurface Sanitizer: memory (MSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_msan_content_shell_drt&range=546083:546086 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6528309027143680 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Apr 3 2018
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8f76378d1ae6d9d6ce6faddc3cc7c91c6ea9e3fa (Check context result in layout tests.). If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
,
Apr 3 2018
This crash is expected and is just crbug.com/817758 moved to a different spot. Someone (which is probably me) should look at why CommandBufferHelper::AllocateRingBuffer() is failing eventually.
,
Apr 11 2018
,
Jul 25
I don't have the cycles for this anytime soon.
,
Jul 27
kylechar@, is there any place to track this bug? Do we expect this to be blocking some other bug/feature?
,
Jul 27
I don't think this is blocking anything but is worth eventually looking into. CommandBufferHelper::AllocateRingBuffer() is failing sometimes. I think it could be an OOM error but I'm not sure if that should happen with ClusterFuzz? Maybe there is some other bug with AllocateRingBuffer() that is fixable? The main issue is I could never reproduce an authentic failure in AllocateRingBuffer() when I looked at it.
,
Oct 10
ClusterFuzz testcase 6528309027143680 is flaky and no longer crashes, so closing issue. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Apr 3 2018Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components