Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8% regression in octane at 544316:544336 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 21 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1108b079440000
,
Mar 28 2018
Ben, any clue why pinpoint already running for nearly a week?
,
Mar 28 2018
Dave: 1. It looks like pinpoint raised AccessTokenRefreshError? 2. Is there a dashboard view of long-running (possibly stalled) pinpoint jobs? 3. It might be a nice feature if we could link to specific build/test/value quests in the UI using hash params.
,
Mar 28 2018
The Nexus 5X and Nexus 6 bots (both WebView and non-WebView) are way overloaded, so jobs take a long time. It's not stalled, though! AccessTokenRefreshError looks like a transient error that will not affect the job results. Looks like the result here is gonna be this CL, though: [in-place weak refs prework] No dependent code handling when maps die. https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/58b0dea85cee7ebba093dc8f6cbb2d2267824b79
,
Mar 31 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1108b079440000 [in-place weak refs prework] No dependent code handling when maps die. by marja@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/58b0dea85cee7ebba093dc8f6cbb2d2267824b79 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Apr 5 2018
I can repro this regression (around 5%) locally on Linux, running only the TypeScript test (commenting out other tests in Octane).
,
Apr 9 2018
This regression is not as reproducible as it first seemed; I can't repro it any more locally :P (I.e., first it looked like I can repro it but that was just... untrue. No idea what was going on.) This also doesn't occur consistently across bots: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=dd93e8573143343dfa346a9cb5d96bf5e458b3b77b43d95deb6c39b983bf88e7&start_rev=542374&end_rev=547380 The regression is only visible in a couple of Android bots.
,
Apr 16 2018
Also checked the roll where this commit is contained; didn't see anything suspicious in the unaddressed regressions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Mar 21 2018