Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.3%-2.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 543641:543664 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 17 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14a87ed1440000
,
Mar 17 2018
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14a87ed1440000 [esnext] Implement Array.prototype.{flatten,flatMap} 🥙 by mathias@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/697d39abff90510523f297bb8577d5c64322229f Update WritableStream to latest standard version by ricea@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/22f1175d58878e0da74589453bc64f264d4679c8 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Mar 19 2018
The WritableStream-related regression is almost certainly issue 759519. There used to be a way to see what other metrics moved at the same time, but I can't find it now. There's a small possibility the test page in question is actually using Streams, in which case this would be a real issue. Is there any way to grep the Javascript that the test runs? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Mar 17 2018