New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 823034 link

Starred by 4 users

Issue metadata

Status: Verified
Owner:
Closed: Mar 2018
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

CHECK failure: false in style_builder.cc

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Mar 17 2018

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6626940308684800

Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3
Job Type: linux_debug_chrome
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  false in style_builder.cc
  blink::StyleBuilder::ApplyProperty
  blink::StyleBuilder::ApplyProperty
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=523893:523905

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6626940308684800

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 17 2018

Components: Blink>CSS
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
Project Member

Comment 2 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 17 2018

Cc: zakerinasab@chromium.org loonyb...@chromium.org
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-CC
Automatically adding ccs based on suspected regression changelists:

Drop UseCounter usage measurement on view-source pages. by loonybear@chromium.org - https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/3f921557c4cb83453bfce0fe8637e489a90064ad

Add ImageData constructor from StaticBitmapImage by zakerinasab@chromium.org - https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2c863229da24ed1cb180759c9342e7a5125fd6f5

If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label.
Owner: futhark@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Can reproduce. Regression range looks bogus. 
Status: Started (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 5 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Mar 22 2018

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/cd755eea8d9f291537513f0bfd85c6e5d9845402

commit cd755eea8d9f291537513f0bfd85c6e5d9845402
Author: Rune Lillesveen <futhark@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Mar 22 09:48:04 2018

Drop property if valid descriptor but not property.

This bug made @font-face and @viewport descriptor names become valid
properties in style rules when the value included var() references.

Bug:  823034 
Change-Id: I1087f110af07d8b92989d55e8bebe9cab19d3e0d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/968489
Commit-Queue: Rune Lillesveen <futhark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#545025}
[modify] https://crrev.com/cd755eea8d9f291537513f0bfd85c6e5d9845402/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/css/parser/CSSPropertyParser.cpp
[modify] https://crrev.com/cd755eea8d9f291537513f0bfd85c6e5d9845402/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/css/parser/CSSPropertyParser.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/cd755eea8d9f291537513f0bfd85c6e5d9845402/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/css/parser/CSSPropertyParserTest.cpp

Status: Fixed (was: Started)
Project Member

Comment 7 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 23 2018

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 545023:545026.

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6626940308684800

Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3
Job Type: linux_debug_chrome
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  false in style_builder.cc
  blink::StyleBuilder::ApplyProperty
  blink::StyleBuilder::ApplyProperty
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=523893:523905
Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=545023:545026

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6626940308684800

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 8 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 23 2018

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Fixed)
ClusterFuzz testcase 6626940308684800 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment