Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
258.5% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 542134:542177 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 16 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/154956be440000
,
Mar 25 2018
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/154956be440000
,
Apr 2 2018
Issue 822879 has been merged into this issue.
,
May 3 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16a64ce3c40000
,
May 4 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16a64ce3c40000 Don't set active_tree_needs_first_draw_ on invalidate by jamwalla@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/989dd34c86ee3a462c467d0c4200faa9046fa496 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
May 4 2018
+boliu We expected regressions here, activation has to wait for previous frame's draw. (see issue 821024 .) But this is a >1ms regression, so on the order of 10% of the frame. Don't know if that's acceptable, but I'm looking at traces now.
,
May 8 2018
I agree queuing duration on the compositor thread going up makes sense for that change, assuming that's what that metric is measuring..
,
May 8 2018
Yep, this is measuring queuing duration. It runs a simple animation while also evaluating some nasty javascript: https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/tools/perf/page_sets/tough_scheduling_cases/_second_batch_js_generator.py
,
Jun 6 2018
,
Jun 18 2018
,
Jun 27 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Mar 16 2018