Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
440688%-2285324.6% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 538765:538923 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis is registering as a 4 TiB regression. It's recovering already, but +erikchen any idea what is going on?
,
Mar 16 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11988b21440000
,
Mar 16 2018
Very interesting. This is a combination of an underflow bug, recently fixed: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/955908 And what is likely to be a misuse of shared memory on macOS. I'll investigate further.
,
Mar 16 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11988b21440000 Revert "[test_env.py] Reland: Warm up vpython virtualenv cache on swarming task shards" by charliea@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/5908c5d2269594aff9c2454c4732360a311c27ca Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Mar 16 2018
Explaining the pinpoint result: the X's mean the test was broken when run, and it started passing at the revert at r538843. Looks like the bisect can't find the culprit until https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/issues/4335 is fixed.
,
Mar 20 2018
,
Mar 20 2018
The underflow is fixed here: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=812346#c4 But the underlying issue is that there is a giant discrepancy between resident shared memory and faulted shared memory in the browser process. More info will be posted in Issue 812346 .
,
Mar 20 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Mar 16 2018