Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Empty websocket frames
Reported by
ahshum...@gmail.com,
Mar 2 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.186 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Go to http://www.websocket.org/echo.html 2. open developer tool > network tab > ws 3. Click "connect" and "send" in the web page. The frames is still empty What is the expected behavior? Packet should be logged in the frames tab. What went wrong? Websocket packet is not logged. Did this work before? Yes Stable 63 Chrome version: 64.0.3282.186 Channel: stable OS Version: Debian 9.2 Flash Version:
,
Mar 2 2018
Thanks for filing the issue! Unable to reproduce the issue on reported chrome version 64.0.3282.186 using Ubuntu 14.04 with the below mentioned steps. 1. Launched Chrome 2. Navigated to http://www.websocket.org/echo.html 3. Opened DevTools -> Network tb -> WS 4. Clicked on "connect" and "send" We observed Websocket packets are logged. Attaching the screen cast of the same. @Reporter: Could you please have a look at the screen cast and let us know if we have missed anything in the process of reproducing the issue. Any further inputs from your end may help us.
,
Mar 2 2018
Sorry for unclear step to reproduce. After clicked "send", the "frames" under WS session is empty. Attaching the screen cast for a clearer steps to reproduce.
,
Mar 2 2018
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Mar 2 2018
,
Mar 2 2018
I am unable to reproduce this. Please try running Chrome with a new profile and no enabled extensions.
,
Mar 2 2018
I found that when env variable "TZ" is not set, the WS frames is empty and
(new Date).toLocaleDateString()
returns
Uncaught RangeError: Unsupported time zone specified undefined
at new DateTimeFormat (native)
at Date.toLocaleDateString (native)
at <anonymous>:1:12
which was not happened in Chrome 63.
,
Mar 2 2018
Interesting. Looks like this is a dupe of 811403 then. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ajha@chromium.org
, Mar 2 2018