Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
CHECK failure: outgoing_messages_.size() <= 100000u in channel_win.cc |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6103590054395904 Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer Job Type: windows_asan_content_shell Platform Id: windows Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: outgoing_messages_.size() <= 100000u in channel_win.cc mojo::edk::ChannelWin::Write mojo::edk::NodeChannel::WriteChannelMessage Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_content_shell&range=538472:538495 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6103590054395904 Additional requirements: Requires HTTP Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Feb 27 2018
This failure is not due to my change. I'm not familiar with the code around the call stack at all so I wouldn't know how to assign this.
,
Feb 28 2018
Unable to find actual suspect through code search as well, marking it as untriaged and requesting someone from mojo team to look in to this issue. Thanks!
,
Mar 8 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 541413:541420. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6103590054395904 Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer Job Type: windows_asan_content_shell Platform Id: windows Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: outgoing_messages_.size() <= 100000u in channel_win.cc mojo::edk::ChannelWin::Write mojo::edk::NodeChannel::WriteChannelMessage Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_content_shell&range=538472:538495 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_content_shell&range=541413:541420 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6103590054395904 Additional requirements: Requires HTTP See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Mar 8 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 6103590054395904 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by brajkumar@chromium.org
, Feb 27 2018Components: Internals>Mojo
Labels: -Type-Bug M-66 Test-Predator-Wrong Type-Bug-Regression
Owner: geoffl...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)