Null-dereference READ in blink::PaintLayerPainter::PaintFragmentWithPhase |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5134946767994880 Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Null-dereference READ Crash Address: 0x000000000020 Crash State: blink::PaintLayerPainter::PaintFragmentWithPhase blink::PaintLayerPainter::PaintLayerContents blink::PaintLayerPainter::Paint Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=537385:537399 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5134946767994880 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Feb 17 2018
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/bf54c05ccf13ff3b26a180f81186426bc56e4ccb ([SPv175] Enable SlimmingPaintV175 for experimental). If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
,
Feb 17 2018
,
Feb 17 2018
,
Feb 19 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 537565:537566. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5134946767994880 Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Null-dereference READ Crash Address: 0x000000000020 Crash State: blink::PaintLayerPainter::PaintFragmentWithPhase blink::PaintLayerPainter::PaintLayerContents blink::PaintLayerPainter::Paint Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=537385:537399 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=537565:537566 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5134946767994880 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page. |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Feb 17 2018Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components