Chrome printing bug: not printing some special character on PS printer |
|||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome version: 64.0.3282.167 OS version: Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.14393] OS version: ChromeOs Case#: 14676599 Description: the customer has a pdf file with some check marks that can be toggled. this check marks are not printed or replaced with another character. (https://screenshot.googleplex.com/tFTTgarkrsP.png) Steps to reproduce: 1) open source file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14LOjBu4cdaTmCx87z-CD5x7mIvfIPYVp 2) toggle some check marks 3) print to a PS printer I've saved as pdf after compiling the source file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1hpdAdzrN0bcCj_DVFpDx1r4lUH7TYI4K Current Behavior / Reproduction: the check marks are not printed: customer screenshot: https://screenshot.googleplex.com/tFTTgarkrsP.png 64.0.3282.167 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e9iHAzD8MP3RfdcjsQ75P76-1dZvxWeb 66.0.3347.1 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ORJurdsSWFBKfPJYRnj7BJlBwmgJ3uGj 66.0.3348.0 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E2hEvbkBH14z9i8UiMPk_n4AZdJaq3fG chromeOS:63.0.3239.140 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1R2rbXIIZq9yBEYhqQ5PCYTZWZvfWHFD- Expected Behavior: check marks printed: acrobat reader https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tbUAbCyEZFeWKEuiyHapXedAaPS1NmQE firefox https://drive.google.com/open?id=1IbXQxz_toT_0HP-LxO29kLMEj99eMyzB Version tested: ChromeOS 63.0.3239.140 (Official Build) stable-channel veyron_minnie https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sm_pzHMNq0XFnEy6MARAUGHA6EzPuvcA 64.0.3282.167 (Official Build) (64-bit) (cohort: 64_167_win) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cKUgxXF8Qm6QDZEVtEa9fwGKmRqkryw5 66.0.3347.1 (Official Build) canary SyzyASan (32-bit) (cohort: ASAN)https://drive.google.com/open?id=15UfKdGEw2JYidRUxayqYdn-bi7fPfbIw 66.0.3348.0 (Official Build) (64-bit) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cQIrG57sINe_VcUDUKDoETaSB0PtG2BX I've also tried to enable chrome://flags/#postscript-printing but there is still the issue: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ESGU_lySToPxorYc0I1ht9iIBQTOt1zA
,
Feb 16 2018
,
Feb 16 2018
A couple of questions: 1) Is ChromeOS being used to print locally (with CUPS) or is this a Chrome OS machine printing to a cloud printer that is connected to a Windows cloud print server? 2) Is this unique to postscript printers in general, a particular postscript printer, or is this happening with Windows printers in general? If it still happens with the postscript printing path disabled (i.e. the Disable PostScript Printing flag enabled as mentioned), that means it is happening with the EMF path, which we use for all Windows printers.
,
Mar 6 2018
marcore: We still have unanswered questions. ^
,
Mar 7 2018
[answers] 1) Chrome OS machine printing to a cloud printer that is connected to a Windows cloud print server (which prints to file://) on the ChromeOS I can't print locally, I don't have the infrastructure. 2) no, I've tried different postscript drivers, but all on Windows. After the following tests, the issue is print to a windows PS printer using Cloudprint. Test on ChromeOS: ChromeOS 64.0.3282.167 :https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Oom2MYBczArRc4YmLrtMge74XmZkSTze tried with this PS drivers: KO ChromeOs_original_file_Cloud_print_dell_laser_printer_1720.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EQ7X_joMweT8M65ofZ5mzNQBE2Ss-h01 KO ChromeOs_original_file_Cloud_print_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KlTlxG3ZOFGzgsOspiDP5J4o4R8noHuq KO ChromeOs_original_file_Cloud_print_xerox_workCentre_7855.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QfykVgx7TQOKxUGp-XZx1vMxaTf81qNI same result, no check marks. I've tried also with beta & Canary(only 1 printer): 65.0.3325.107 (Official Build) beta (64-bit) https://drive.google.com/open?id=142tOy9CZ_Q9lTMmWSuBZFCzk9UpunM1j 67.0.3363.0 (Official Build) canary (64-bit) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cBHu1UcaXebxtZBbN91BRuSx2t2wReNN KO ChromeOs_Canary_original_file_Cloud_print_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oDckf94PD2YmXOcnlrz5ktEufx33BG0I KO ChromeOs_Beta_original_file_Cloud_print_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1P-jO9sBSU7xfXe_IpCM2EpOK-PP8qmAD same result, no check marks. On windows system: If I print directly to the PS printer it prints correctly, if I use CloudPrint no check marks. Chrome: 65.0.3325.146 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yS3UJl12l6jgZ4-_P2FyxgeFwxEJFt5g OK windows_original_file_dell_laser_printer_1720.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1S_UcKfqcSq9WdC6HOw_wckq-xsJZkAlQ OK windows_original_file_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1V-CmazBXQSI5zieYs8E1-s5teTsBGvBp OK windows_original_file_xerox_workCentre_7855.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Eye-qZZcL3OJfieWhoCdsjTRgYPC-4vW KO windows_original_file_Cloud_print_dell_laser_printer_1720.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VaQzjDQLi8vOzSfSSTkKl4moQs9aUJEt KO windows_original_file_Cloud_print_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HEt3mPNeU6uSrIjNOL2_o2mrdZa4UyiT KO windows_original_file_Cloud_print_xerox_workCentre_7855.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Q4XDhhaxIgypCYdbj8aOpKoTW0u4ZPvT
,
Mar 7 2018
,
Mar 7 2018
,
Mar 7 2018
That explains why the flag didn't make a difference. Cloud print doesn't use the postscript printing path (see https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/service/cloud_print/print_system_win.cc?l=451 where the mode is set to NORMAL). Given that this is the case, I am curious if you can reproduce the missing checkmarks by printing locally on Windows with the "Disable PostScript Printing" flag set to "Enabled", as this will force the local printing to go through PDF to EMF conversion, which I think will be more similar to the cloud print path. Unfortunately I am having trouble reproducing this on Windows. What version of Windows are you running for the Windows tests? I installed the HP color laserjet 2700 PS driver and a Xerox universal PS driver to print to file on Windows 10. I saw checkmarks when I converted the output document back to PDF for both local and cloud printing.
,
Mar 7 2018
,
Mar 8 2018
my test environment is based on Google Cloud platform, so all windows machine are server. AD domain controller (mre-2008-AD): windows 2008 R2 Datacenter on this server is installed the Cloud print connector and the various printers. I run the cloud print connector in a cmd window for debug and save to file interactions. Client in the domain: mre-2008-client: Windows 2008 R2 Datacenter mre-2012-client: Windows 2012 R2 Datacenter mre-2016-client: Windows 2016 Datacenter I don't convert the files from PS to PDF because on my linux desktop, Document Viewer can read directly the PS files. testing locally with --enable-features=DisablePostScriptPrinting in incognito mode (so there is no confusion on which printer is using) OK windows_original_file_Disable_postscript_HP_color_laserJet_2800.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=10j-OT5ryFjkk5EQ9-vZohpc_MQBWwQox OK windows_original_file_Disable_postscript_dell_laser_printer_1720.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EaCzNMbDitl7ncSZ2hkLNe_ntRpM9a61 OK windows_original_file_Disable_postscript_xerox_workCentre_7855.ps https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AwaCDsmXcG6_OOLEUHZb6bxaO5ujcuNv
,
Apr 20 2018
rbpotter: where you able to reproduce on your systems ? I've tried with the last canary: 68.0.3400.0 on ChromeOS but it's still not displaying the special characters
,
Apr 30 2018
,
Jun 29 2018
rbpotter@ Is there any update that can be shared with the customer?
,
Jul 3
Tried this again on latest Stable (67) to see if it reproduces now. Added PostScript printer driver to cloud print through chrome://devices on a Win10 machine and tried printing from Windows and Linux. This time I just looked at the output PS directly. In both cases the checkmarks showed up. I was planning to also try adding the printers with the cloud print service like I did earlier, but that currently isn't working for me at all with M67. Based on comment 10 it sounds like this doesn't reproduce with local printing. Maybe it is somehow related to cloud print + a Windows server machine, instead of normal Windows 10? It will be difficult to make much more progress without a way to reproduce the issue.
,
Jul 3
rbpotter: I'm not aware of any issues with CloudPrint right now. Are you using the standalone connector from Github: https://github.com/google/cloud-print-connector or Chrome itself (we strongly recommend the standalone connector in enterprise setups).
,
Jul 3
I've tried with the standalone connector in the past and was not able to reproduce the issue. However, as noted in comment 14, the standalone connector currently isn't working for me on M67 (have tried a couple of different Windows 10 machines and am still unable to print anything). Once we debug that issue, I can try again with the connector. Wasn't necessarily saying this is a cloud print server side issue, but rather that it is specific to printing with cloud printers, since marcore@ confirmed it cannot be reproduced with either local printing path on Windows. This means there is a good chance it is unrelated to the PostScript and EMF local printing code.
,
Jul 3
Update: jayhlee@ helped me get the cloud print connector set up on Windows, and I can now reproduce this. It does not appear to be PS printer specific, as it also reproduces when I add the XPS Document Writer using the connector and print to that. I also confirmed that it only reproduces with printers added via the connector (not chrome://devices) and does not reproduce with local printing on Windows (either PostScript or EMF).
,
Jul 3
This sounds like a bug in the standalone connector. Looking at the code, it appears to be using libpoppler to render the PDF from the Cloud Print server for printing to the local printer.
,
Jul 3
One can potentially work around this bug with the "Print as image" option in Print Preview on ChromeOS.
,
Jul 12
Unassigning myself for now since this looks like a connector bug rather than an issue with the Chrome PostScript printing path, and I am not all that familiar with the cloud print connector - thestig@, do you know who might be able to take a look at this from the cloud print/connector side?
,
Jul 12
jayhlee: ^
,
Nov 21
|
|||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||
Comment 1 by marcore@chromium.org
, Feb 16 2018