Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Security DCHECK failure: line_layout_item.IsLayoutInline() || line_layout_item.IsEqual(this) in LayoutBlo |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4728647156760576 Fuzzer: bj_broddelwerk Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Security DCHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: line_layout_item.IsLayoutInline() || line_layout_item.IsEqual(this) in LayoutBlo blink::LayoutBlockFlow::CreateLineBoxes blink::LayoutBlockFlow::ConstructLine Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=535341:535343 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4728647156760576 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Feb 15 2018
,
Feb 16 2018
,
Feb 16 2018
This is a serious security regression. If you are not able to fix this quickly, please revert the change that introduced it. If this doesn't affect a release branch, or has not been properly classified for severity, please update the Security_Impact or Security_Severity labels, and remove the ReleaseBlock label. To disable this altogether, apply ReleaseBlock-NA. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Feb 19 2018
Looking, but unable to reproduce, tried: * Run the test on local Win * Run the test on local Linux ASAN * Run the test using "/google/data/ro/teams/clusterfuzz-tools/releases/clusterfuzz reproduce 4728647156760576" ``` New crash type: New crash state: Original crash type: Security DCHECK failure Original crash state: line_layout_item.IsLayoutInline() || line_layout_item.IsEqual(this) in LayoutBlockFlowLine.cpp blink::LayoutBlockFlow::CreateLineBoxes blink::LayoutBlockFlow::ConstructLine The stacktrace doesn't match the original stacktrace. Try again (3 times). Press Ctrl+C to stop trying to reproduce. UnreproducibleError: The crash cannot be reproduced after trying 3 times. Here are things you can try: - Run outside XVFB (e.g. you will be able to see the launched program on screen.) with `--disable-xvfb`, which is especially useful for Chrome. - Run with the downloaded build by adding `--build download`. - Run `build/install-build-deps.sh` to ensure all dependencies are installed. - Run with more number of trials by adding `-i 10`, which is especially good for gesture-related testcases. - Use gdb to debug by adding `--enable-debug`. ``` Within the regressed range, this one looks more suspicious, but the test doesn't use shadow nor slots. Introduce slot-in-flat-tree behind experimental flag. https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/871150 cc'ing rune in case he has some better idea. Ran another regressed/fixed job to see if it still reproduces on the bot.
,
Feb 22 2018
I still can't reproduce this locally. Also "clusterfuzz reproduce 4728647156760576" now shows: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxcursor1-dbg : Depends: libxcursor1 (= 1:1.1.14-1+deb9u1) but 1:1.1.15-1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. but I can't find this package. % sudo apt-get install libxcursor1=1:1.1.14-1+deb9u1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Version '1:1.1.14-1+deb9u1' for 'libxcursor1' was not found ...giving up.
,
Mar 1 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 4728647156760576 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk). If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase. Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.
,
Mar 2 2018
,
Mar 27 2018
,
May 31 2018
This bug has been closed for more than 14 weeks. Removing security view restrictions. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Feb 15 2018Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components