Direct-leak in BindRepeating<void |
|||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5134082607153152 Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified Job Type: linux_lsan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Direct-leak Crash Address: Crash State: BindRepeating<void BindRepeating<void blink::ElementVisibilityObserver::Start Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_lsan_chrome_mp&range=512477:512486 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5134082607153152 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Feb 13 2018
This appears to be caused by ElementVisibilityObserver.
,
Feb 13 2018
ElementVisibilityObserver looks related to IntersectionObserverer. mlamouri@, could you have a chance to take a look? Also +Blink>Editing because the test is using editing commands.
,
Feb 13 2018
Assigning to skyostill@ to investigate the calling site first (EVO is used in different places so it's likely this is specific to this usage).
,
Feb 14 2018
Hmm, is the bug here that we're not tracing the callback in the observer? https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/intersection_observer/IntersectionObserver.cpp?rcl=b860ecad247794f36735be49900cb01fca27e5ee&l=52
,
Feb 15 2018
Are base::Callbacks GC'd objects that need to be traced?
,
Jun 12 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 566300:566302. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5134082607153152 Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified Job Type: linux_lsan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Direct-leak Crash Address: Crash State: BindRepeating<void BindRepeating<void blink::ElementVisibilityObserver::Start Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_lsan_chrome_mp&range=512477:512486 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_lsan_chrome_mp&range=566300:566302 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5134082607153152 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jun 12 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 5134082607153152 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Feb 9 2018Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components