New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 808866 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2018
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Direct-leak in blink::Node::SetLayoutObject

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Feb 4 2018

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5049011686604800

Fuzzer: inferno_twister_c
Job Type: linux_lsan_chrome_mp
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Direct-leak
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  blink::Node::SetLayoutObject
  blink::LayoutTreeBuilderForText::CreateLayoutObject
  blink::Text::AttachLayoutTree
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_lsan_chrome_mp&range=209699:209703

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5049011686604800

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Cc: brajkumar@chromium.org
Components: Blink>Layout
Labels: -Pri-2 M-64 Test-Predator-Wrong CF-NeedsTriage Pri-1
Unable to find actual suspect through code search and also observing no CL under regression range, hence adding appropriate label and leaving it as untriaged for further updates.

Thanks!

Comment 2 by e...@chromium.org, Feb 6 2018

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Unactionable without either a repro or a regression range. Please stop filing bug like this.
Cc: mmoroz@chromium.org
eae@, just wondering, this seems to be a reproducible test case from ClusterFuzz and there is 'Unminimized Testcase' attached to the report (https://clusterfuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/5049011686604800?noredirect=1). If this test case doesn't make sense then you want us to update CF team not to file these kind of reports?

mmoroz@, any inputs here?

Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by ClusterFuzz, Feb 13 2018

Labels: Needs-Feedback
ClusterFuzz testcase 5049011686604800 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk).

If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase.

Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.

Sign in to add a comment