Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Null-dereference WRITE in sw::FrameBufferX11::~FrameBufferX11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6027547641643008 Fuzzer: puzzor Job Type: linux_asan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Null-dereference WRITE Crash Address: 0x000000000010 Crash State: sw::FrameBufferX11::~FrameBufferX11 egl::WindowSurface::swap gpu::PassThroughImageTransportSurface::SwapBuffers Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_chrome_mp&range=532825:532827 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6027547641643008 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Jan 31 2018
Predator and CL could not provide any possible suspects. Using Code Search for the file, "pass_through_image_transport_surface.cc" and observed there was some recent changes for the below file. Suspect CL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6bf92778c48f4041a2e21c29c89bfc4683e9d34d%5E%21/gpu/ipc/service/pass_through_image_transport_surface.cc penghuang@ -- Could you please check whether this is caused with respect to your change, if not please help us in assigning it to the right owner. Thanks!
,
Jan 31 2018
I don't think it is related to my change. sugoi, could you please take a look this issue? Thanks.
,
Feb 1 2018
,
Feb 1 2018
capn@ just investigated issue 807079 which was in the same class as this issue. capn@, can you have a quick look?
,
Feb 2 2018
M65 Beta promotion is coming soon and your bug is labelled as Beta ReleaseBlock, pls make sure to land the fix and request a merge to M65 branch 3325 ASAP (merge has to be done latest by Monday, 02/05 @ 1:00 PM PT). Thank you.
,
Feb 2 2018
I couldn't reproduce this locally, and clusterfuzz also can no longer reproduce this. I'm fairly confident that this was just an issue with the X11 setup of the clusterfuzz machine this was running on, which we can't really recover from anyway so crashing the GPU process is acceptable.
,
Feb 9 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 6222763568922624 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk). If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase. Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Jan 30 2018