Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2%-6.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 531332:531461 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 25 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16e8e75c840000
,
Jan 25 2018
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16e8e75c840000
,
Jan 26 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13ea0c2c840000
,
Jan 27 2018
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13ea0c2c840000
,
Mar 3 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13d8b7a4440000
,
Mar 3 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14b519bc440000
,
Mar 3 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13d8b7a4440000 Do not store favicon for all tabs in MediaSessionTabHelper by ssid@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/f5d5e2e779a0cc6d6e128b5915b5facbbace201c Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Mar 4 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14b519bc440000 [heap] allocation step should before limit update by ofrobots@google.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/95249bca1f473283c11b1a808e1a06767feeb899 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Mar 5 2018
I'll take a look.
,
Mar 19 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12f61a81440000
,
Mar 19 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12f61a81440000 Do not store favicon for all tabs in MediaSessionTabHelper by ssid@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/f5d5e2e779a0cc6d6e128b5915b5facbbace201c Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Mar 19 2018
There two regressions grouped into this bug. Java memory regressions bisect to ssid's CL. I forked them to crbug.com/823311
,
Mar 21 2018
The original change was to reduce memory usage and if I understand correctly, we are actually regressing memory usage? Before taking another change on top of it that is going to increase complexity a bit more, can we look into the benefits of this and whether we are going in the right direction?
,
Mar 21 2018
Sorry. I reported the wrong bug number in the cl. I have explained in Issue 806861. Assigning this to ulan to look at the other regression.
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 25 2018