Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
[SPv175+] Incorrect transform state for out-of-flow positioned object under non-container transformed ancestor |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue description
For the following case:
<table>
<tr style="transform: rotate(10deg)">
<td>
<div style="position: absolute">ABSOLUTE</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
The transformed tr is not a containing block of the absolute-position div, but the transform state of the absolute-position div should be under the tr's transform.
Or is it a bug that the transformed tr should actually be the containing block?
,
Jan 22 2018
Tested on other browsers using http://jsbin.com/cemigih: - Firefox: applies transform of tr on absolute/fixed children, and tr also acts as the containing block of the absolute/fixed children. - Edge: Ignores the transform - Chrome/Safari: applies transform of tr on absolute/fixed children, but tr is not the containing block of the absolute/fixed children.
,
Jan 26 2018
,
Jan 31 2018
Merging into bug 804592 because there will be nothing to do for this bug after that bug is fixed.
,
Jan 31 2018
,
Mar 29 2018
Un-marking as a duplicate because the other bug has nothing to do with Blink rendering. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by wangxianzhu@chromium.org
, Jan 22 2018