New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 801917 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2018
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Stack-overflow in HandleDynamicTypeCacheMiss

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Jan 14 2018

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5955599992094720

Fuzzer: mbarbella_webcomponents
Job Type: linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Stack-overflow
Crash Address: 0x7ffd4525cf58
Crash State:
  HandleDynamicTypeCacheMiss
  __ubsan_handle_dynamic_type_cache_miss
  blink::Node::MutableComputedStyle
  
Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt&range=454833:454835

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5955599992094720

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Jan 15 2018

Components: Blink>DOM
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.

Comment 2 by rakina@chromium.org, Jan 15 2018

Status: Available (was: Untriaged)

Comment 3 by kochi@chromium.org, Jan 15 2018

Labels: -Pri-1 Pri-2
Looks like the test is creating very deep tree and removing it overflows stack.
I'll make sure it is the case, but looks like P2 is enough.

Comment 4 by kochi@chromium.org, Jan 15 2018

Not sure this is really a regression.
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, May 17 2018

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5955599992094720 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Project Member

Comment 6 by ClusterFuzz, May 17 2018

Status: WontFix (was: Available)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5955599992094720 is flaky and no longer crashes, so closing issue.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment