Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
92.8% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 528341:528436 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 12 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8957577551031557728
,
Jan 12 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.canvas Metric : toBlob_duration/toBlob_duration Revision Result N chromium@528340 691.16 +- 0.650538 2 good chromium@528436 1617.91 +- 1035.26 5 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8957577551031557728 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 25 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13c2e4bc840000
,
Jan 25 2018
Retrying with pinpoint, but this test is really noisy.
,
Jan 26 2018
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13c2e4bc840000
,
Mar 3 2018
Looks like this is pretty noisy, and went back down. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 12 2018