Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.8% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 526872:526926 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 11 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14bb0ba7040000
,
Jan 12 2018
๐ Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14bb0ba7040000 Surface synchronization: Always allocate a new LocalSurfaceId on auto-resize By fsamuel@chromium.org ยท Thu Jan 04 02:04:20 2018 chromium @ 4733241338f7408784ca6c2391c6d9c26ae04d60 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jan 26 2018
+jbroman@ I believe you own this test? I was hoping you could help me figure out how to repro locally? Also, does anything in this test do auto-resize?
,
Jan 29 2018
#4: it would seem odd to me that your CL would affect it (there's only one frame and it isn't resized -- not sure what auto-resize is). As far as running this benchmark: tools/perf/run_benchmark blink_perf.bindings --story=filter=first-child
,
Feb 19 2018
This is definitely not my bug. I'm assigning to jbroman@ for triage.
,
Feb 23 2018
Hard to tell, but this doesn't look like a real regression (doesn't persist, doesn't occur similarly on other platforms). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 11 2018