CHECK failure: IsRooted() in LayoutObject.cpp |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5781696229408768 Fuzzer: mbarbella_webcomponents Job Type: linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: IsRooted() in LayoutObject.cpp blink::LayoutObject::ContainerForPaintInvalidation blink::ObjectPaintInvalidator::InvalidatePaintIncludingNonCompositingDescendants Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt&range=526968:526970 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5781696229408768 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Jan 4 2018
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files. If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
,
Jan 4 2018
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/4766c5012f46eed5afec44dcbc10e7365eadbc1b (Merge anonymous table boxes when appropriate.). If this is incorrect, please remove the owner and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label.
,
Jan 5 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 527017:527023. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5781696229408768 Fuzzer: mbarbella_webcomponents Job Type: linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: IsRooted() in LayoutObject.cpp blink::LayoutObject::ContainerForPaintInvalidation blink::ObjectPaintInvalidator::InvalidatePaintIncludingNonCompositingDescendants Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt&range=526968:526970 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_vptr_content_shell_drt&range=527017:527023 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5781696229408768 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jan 5 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 5781696229408768 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Jan 4 2018