> The check should have been for the intended model, not the board.

Checking the model isn't always the right answer, since some suites
are still scheduled by board only.

> > The check should have been for the intended model, not the board.
>
> Checking the model isn't always the right answer, since some suites
> are still scheduled by board only.

The right answer is to check against the board, pool, and
child_dependencies, and not merely board and pool, as is currently done.

In theory, I have the "fix the board/model distinctions" portfolio.

In practice, I believe that this particular change won't get attention
for quite some time to come.

Looking at the actual implementation of check_dut_availability(),
I don't believe that the fix to this bug is separable from the
fix for bug 876121.  So, let's just mark them as duplicates.