New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 798609 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 2018
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

58.2% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 521496:521570

Project Member Reported by ericrk@chromium.org, Jan 3 2018

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=798609

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=bacbff5f54c23243c737e2a947e1e8e247f697ae400f595e5d5423b0bd134885


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus6

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : thread_times.key_silk_cases
  Metric       : thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame/infinite_scrolling.html

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@521495      2.0195 +- 0.907397       21      good
chromium@521570      2.02194 +- 0.916933      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=infinite.scrolling.html thread_times.key_silk_cases

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958465882921279104


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect can't repro.

Sign in to add a comment