Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
99.6%-99.8% regression in blink_perf.layout at 526389:526406 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 2 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520581835291424
,
Jan 3 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Chris Harrelson Commit : d45f384824617447c7e4e8808b4946230dab58e2 Date : Sat Dec 30 01:02:37 2017 Subject: Revert "Revert "[CI] Migrate hit-testing code in PaintLayer to use GeometryMapper."" Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : multicol_tall-content-short-columns-realistic/multicol_tall-content-short-columns-realistic Change : 99.58% | 1103.89681177 -> 4.66447263694 Revision Result N chromium@526398 1103.9 +- 23.9961 6 good chromium@526399 1091.72 +- 21.3897 6 good chromium@526400 4.61569 +- 0.0484738 6 bad <-- chromium@526401 4.61703 +- 0.0802321 6 bad chromium@526404 4.66447 +- 0.0713948 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520581835291424 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 2 2018