Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 525249:525301 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 2 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520851615043824
,
Jan 2 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo Revision Result N chromium@525248 93149090 +- 1609492 21 good chromium@525301 93362667 +- 1690425 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520851615043824 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 3 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958416885907029312
,
Jan 3 2018
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author yangguo@chromium.org === Hi yangguo@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Yang Guo Commit : 9c6bc7afc0f8a62e24df92d72e41f2f9d590e023 Date : Wed Dec 20 07:34:39 2017 Subject: Leave spaces between instance types. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo Change : 1.73% | 92869058.6667 -> 94474170.6667 Revision Result N chromium@524500 92869059 +- 881640 6 good chromium@524950 92723309 +- 962053 6 good chromium@525175 93413989 +- 557802 6 good chromium@525288 93592108 +- 1336202 9 good chromium@525344 93550807 +- 1029337 9 good chromium@525344,v8@9c6bc7afc0 94664293 +- 733889 6 bad <-- chromium@525344,v8@c293bc010b 94925243 +- 1114501 6 bad chromium@525344,v8@bf691e79d7 94899813 +- 446646 6 bad chromium@525345 94809872 +- 353189 6 bad chromium@525346 94729317 +- 425160 6 bad chromium@525348 94998971 +- 1124073 6 bad chromium@525351 94710885 +- 1326407 6 bad chromium@525358 94455227 +- 361252 6 bad chromium@525372 94435088 +- 652981 6 bad chromium@525400 94474171 +- 775580 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958416885907029312 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 25 2018
This came back down; marking fixed since I know yanggou landed some fixes for memory issues. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 2 2018