Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8%-3.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 525102:525274 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 2 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520955617632272
,
Jan 2 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_cricbuzz Revision Result N chromium@525101 43048011 +- 3073927 21 good chromium@525274 43600064 +- 3477566 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cricbuzz system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8958520955617632272 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 3 2018
Looks like the metric subsequently recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 2 2018