Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.3%-416.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 524742:525248 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959561365349168640
,
Dec 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Revision Result N chromium@524760 422852 +- 4011.14 21 good chromium@524876 422886 +- 3989.4 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959561365349168640 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 23 2018
Another memory regression which doesn't repro in bisect, and comes back down later. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 21 2017