Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13%-42.1% regression in blink_perf.css at 524858:525003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 21 2017
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12bd1f7e040000
,
Dec 22 2017
๐ฟ Pinpoint job stopped with an error. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12bd1f7e040000
,
Jan 23 2018
Kicking off a few more bisects.
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e6ea2c840000
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14908c6c840000
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12adc0d4840000
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ฟ Pinpoint job stopped with an error. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12adc0d4840000
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ฟ Pinpoint job stopped with an error. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e6ea2c840000
,
Jan 23 2018
๐ Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14908c6c840000
,
Jan 25 2018
Sorry, I pushed a bad build of Pinpoint on Tuesday. Re-running the errored jobs.
,
Jan 25 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13aeb09c840000
,
Jan 25 2018
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e24052840000
,
Jan 25 2018
๐ Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e24052840000 Revert "Revert "[Ribbon] Remove ID arg from CSSProperty constructor"" By rjwright@chromium.org ยท Tue Dec 19 04:00:51 2017 chromium @ 387ce3b31392d2fdc4fbc682f2a962ff28f4938c Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jan 26 2018
,
Feb 2 2018
This CL was a revert.
,
Feb 2 2018
๐ Found significant differences after each of 7 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13aeb09c840000 [Ribbon][Reupload] Remove CSSProperty groups by rjwright@chromium.org chromium @ 505ec4645e87ce2bfc7875b053d3f48967aabbc5 Mojo JS bindings: update some TODOs. by yzshen@chromium.org chromium @ 5862ffc3f7ca6bf9c1287b80ac978163370da554 VariationsService now validates all signatures for HTTP requests. by carlosil@chromium.org chromium @ f8472f5f0e0f5b399b7f5147b0e8447a85baac0b mash: Convert HandleAccessibilityGesture method through mojo by warx@chromium.org chromium @ 9e12fa765e2b878bb57c1d6a73655e0f162e7027 Roll src/third_party/skia/ 0b90fa88a..84bfc9589 (1 commit) by skia-deps-roller@chromium.org chromium @ dc926f03b83cf0a4cfc242487b1a2542dd92e0f9 Revert "Revert "[Ribbon] Remove ID arg from CSSProperty constructor"" by rjwright@chromium.org chromium @ 387ce3b31392d2fdc4fbc682f2a962ff28f4938c Remove passing failure expectations for incremental-shadow-dom by kochi@chromium.org chromium @ dacffa53f8006988a14be38293ad77755803dac6 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Feb 5 2018
Mine's just a test expectation change, should not affect any perf benchmarks. I guess this pinpoint system has a problem - assigning too many Cc will lose focus from anyone included, and they just ignore. And it's too hard to revert all, or confirm the regression is *fixed*. And reusing the same issue for different set of CLs (the OP and comment#17) makes me wonder what is going on behind the system. Assigning back to the original reporter.
,
Feb 6 2018
This is WontFix. The revert brought perf back to where it was before.
,
Feb 7 2018
Oops, sorry bradnelson@ and brianderson@ for my confusion :-( |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 21 2017