Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4%-3.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 524055:524108 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959854643810161744
,
Dec 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur Change : 1.98% | 18219876.0 -> 18607127.1111 Suspected Commit Range 2 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/068c786ea56aff47173f8c3e1f16329bb0effd6d..54857f4351ae59436f7a7363204b6b6bca309140 Revision Result N chromium@524054 18219876 +- 595932 14 good chromium@524056 18201793 +- 563424 14 good chromium@524057 --- --- build failure chromium@524058 18489798 +- 1449566 21 bad chromium@524061 18634946 +- 1436996 14 bad chromium@524067 18649332 +- 648947 9 bad chromium@524081 18565255 +- 923993 14 bad chromium@524108 18607127 +- 474498 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959854643810161744 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959763864986335520
,
Dec 19 2017
Retry...
,
Dec 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_washingtonpost Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.washingtonpost system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959763864986335520 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 19 2017
Cannot reproduce. I'll add this bug to the Speed>Bisection component in case someone there have ideas what to do. The graph clearly shows a regression.
,
Dec 20 2017
The bisect in #6 failed since it couldn't run the load.news.washingtonpost story, but the first bisect succeeded but there were build failures. You could try running the first one again (load.media.imgur), might have just timed out waiting. It looks like that middle cl is an ios cl, so shouldn't have any reason to fail building.
,
Dec 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959671995251028576
,
Dec 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ali Ijaz Sheikh Commit : 4623b8223b487fb18b3af12fcf4fdbb7a194eca3 Date : Tue Dec 12 19:12:03 2017 Subject: [heap] replace DisableInlineAllocationSteps with PauseAllocationObservers Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur Change : 1.82% | 18244678.2857 -> 18647861.1429 Revision Result N chromium@524054 18244678 +- 780571 14 good chromium@524056 18267581 +- 581127 14 good chromium@524056,v8@10d9c31488 18260812 +- 888804 21 good chromium@524056,v8@4623b8223b 18492627 +- 308804 9 bad <-- chromium@524056,v8@1220809924 18563559 +- 1211123 14 bad chromium@524056,v8@aba57b1164 18555143 +- 1210809 14 bad chromium@524056,v8@27da2f8ccf 18500809 +- 1288390 21 bad chromium@524056,v8@d5fbf0edcf 18433520 +- 1129525 21 bad chromium@524057 18473991 +- 1208730 21 bad chromium@524058 18626460 +- 740404 14 bad chromium@524062 18637819 +- 562209 6 bad chromium@524068 18476027 +- 655656 14 bad chromium@524082 18552189 +- 713608 9 bad chromium@524108 18647861 +- 804288 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8959671995251028576 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 18 2017