Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8140.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 524133:524201 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8960120259784365936
,
Dec 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Revision Result N chromium@524132 2755048 +- 37004351 21 good chromium@524201 6684867 +- 53691555 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.mobile.twitter.com.justinbieber.skip.interstitial.true memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8960120259784365936 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 18 2017
I cannot say from the graph if this is a regression for sure. I will wait a few days for more data points and triage if it looks like a regression.
,
Jan 23 2018
Juan: There was a jump in noise here, which went away, then maybe came back in bug 804862 . I'm WontFix-ing since it went away, but feel free to file another bug on the noise if you think it would help. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 15 2017