Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
33.8%-35.3% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 521229:521251 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961032289108854400
,
Dec 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Naina Raisinghani Commit : b71f5b7df345f1a8603b7cf7b59edf48288e7d96 Date : Mon Dec 04 01:01:29 2017 Subject: Remove calls to styleForLayoutObject() in LayoutTreeBuilder::style() Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.shadow_dom Metric : v1-large-deep-layout/v1-large-deep-layout Change : 36.74% | 18735.285 -> 25617.8436667 Revision Result N chromium@521228 18735.3 +- 100.719 6 good chromium@521234 18882.7 +- 48.5705 6 good chromium@521237 18707.1 +- 127.849 6 good chromium@521239 18793.1 +- 156.911 6 good chromium@521240 25648.3 +- 201.123 6 bad <-- chromium@521251 25617.8 +- 125.22 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961032289108854400 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 5 2017