Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.3%-20.3% regression in loading.desktop at 521232:521272 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 5 2017
๐ Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14cedd94040000
,
Dec 5 2017
๐ Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14cedd94040000 Remove calls to styleForLayoutObject() in LayoutTreeBuilder::style() By nainar@chromium.org ยท Mon Dec 04 01:01:29 2017 chromium @ b71f5b7df345f1a8603b7cf7b59edf48288e7d96 Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jan 22 2018
futhark: Can you take a look since nainar's status says "DO NOT USE"? Here are some traces from the bisect that pinpointed the regression to the CL: Before the CL: https://storage.cloud.google.com/chrome-telemetry-output/Economist_2017-12-05_08-58-36_68625.html After the CL: https://storage.cloud.google.com/chrome-telemetry-output/Economist_2017-12-05_08-46-03_62228.html
,
Jan 22 2018
Hi, Sorry I was testing an OOO message and I accidentally set it. Working on this bug.
,
Feb 2 2018
This report (and others) show the numbers being lower than the baseline when the bug was filed. Marking as WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 5 2017