New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 791877 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Verified
Owner:
Closed: Dec 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Sanitizer CHECK failure in ((data_.proc_self_maps.len)) > ((0)) (0, 0)

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Dec 5 2017

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4557669993283584

Fuzzer: inferno_webbot
Job Type: linux_cfi_chrome
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Sanitizer CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  ((data_.proc_self_maps.len)) > ((0)) (0, 0)
  
Sanitizer: cfi (CFI)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_cfi_chrome&range=520598:520629

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4557669993283584

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Cc: kkaluri@chromium.org
Components: Internals>Media>Video
Labels: M-65 Test-Predator-Wrong CF-NeedsTriage
Unable to provide possible suspect using Predator, CL and Code Search.
Could someone please look into the issue.

Thank You...
Cc: mmoroz@chromium.org
This is another oom issue with a bad stack I think +mmoroz.
Owner: p...@chromium.org
Nice, seems to be an assert in sanitizer_common :)

Peter, are you a right person to assign this to?
Project Member

Comment 4 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 6 2017

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 521899:521922.

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4557669993283584

Fuzzer: inferno_webbot
Job Type: linux_cfi_chrome
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Sanitizer CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  ((data_.proc_self_maps.len)) > ((0)) (0, 0)
  
Sanitizer: cfi (CFI)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_cfi_chrome&range=520598:520629
Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_cfi_chrome&range=521899:521922

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4557669993283584

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 6 2017

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Untriaged)
ClusterFuzz testcase 4557669993283584 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment