Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
AwContentsClientFullScreenTest#testExitFullscreenEndsIfAppInvokesCallbackFromOnHideCustomView timeout |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSaw this on the sheriff dashboard, putting this in the webview queue for now. I'll add @retryonfailure tomorrow, but someone can steal this if they need to. Flakiness dashboard (there a 3 timeouts on there): https://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#testType=webview_instrumentation_test_apk&tests=org.chromium.android_webview.test.AwContentsClientFullScreenTest%23testExitFullscreenEndsIfAppInvokesCallbackFromOnHideCustomView Bot: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.android/builders/Lollipop%20Phone%20Tester/builds/16928 (search for "webview_instrumentation_test_apk") --- This looks like it's flaky, so I think we should just add @RetryOnFailure. I'll check the other tests in the class later to see if they flake similarly.
,
Dec 7 2017
Seems to only be timing out on the Lollipop phone tester bot. Disabling this test for now and removing from sheriff queue since the bug is assigned.
,
Dec 7 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/532c0b9a129883b3caa4f0f39da7ff39d8c84f45 commit 532c0b9a129883b3caa4f0f39da7ff39d8c84f45 Author: Peter Kasting <pkasting@chromium.org> Date: Thu Dec 07 23:44:09 2017 Disable flaky test. Bug: 789306 Change-Id: I909db9bbc0373af1170f7a6471e9795cc6e0a3b4 TBR: ntfschr Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/815289 Reviewed-by: Peter Kasting <pkasting@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Peter Kasting <pkasting@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#522620} [modify] https://crrev.com/532c0b9a129883b3caa4f0f39da7ff39d8c84f45/android_webview/javatests/src/org/chromium/android_webview/test/AwContentsClientFullScreenTest.java
,
Dec 13 2017
I'll try running this test overnight on my Nexus 6 (Android L)
,
Dec 16 2017
I can repro the timeout locally now. I'm running into some issues switching to JS over DOMUtils--if I can't resolve my problems, I'll reenable the test with @RetryOnFailure since the flake seems pretty rare locally.
,
Dec 28 2017
Issue 797197 has been merged into this issue.
,
Dec 28 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/08696cc241a2a8df1134322a4ba3d2e547063e51 commit 08696cc241a2a8df1134322a4ba3d2e547063e51 Author: Sergey Ulanov <sergeyu@chromium.org> Date: Thu Dec 28 00:42:34 2017 Disable flaky test testFullscreenForNonVideoElementIsSupportedInSoftwareMode is flaky, disabling it. Bug: 797197 , 789306 Change-Id: I61d5e2cb4458fe5c6346a1f80398831c7dd9691e TBR: ntfschr@chromium.org Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/845147 Reviewed-by: Sergey Ulanov <sergeyu@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sergey Ulanov <sergeyu@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#526257} [modify] https://crrev.com/08696cc241a2a8df1134322a4ba3d2e547063e51/android_webview/javatests/src/org/chromium/android_webview/test/AwContentsClientFullScreenTest.java
,
Feb 8 2018
Issue 808444 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jun 19 2018
Not actively looking at this, someone else from the team should take this if they have bandwidth.
,
Jun 19 2018
,
Aug 16
Nate, I'm afraid that we may end up getting regression if we keep these tests disabled. Could you spend some time investigating this and other DOM util related flakiness? Also cc'ing tobiasjs@ and boliu@ from issue 791019
,
Aug 21
Also, issue 618749...
,
Aug 23
,
Sep 2
Anyone object to removing RBD? Rationale: * WebView Dev population is extremely small. I think it's worse (in this particular case) to block a clank dev release than it would be to release a potentially regressed WebView * Test was disabled a while ago, not during M71 (that's just an arbitrary milestone) * I have no reason to particularly suspect regressions in this code area; there is not a particularly high risk for regression I'm still intending to focus on this, but it'll have to wait until I'm back from OOO (or, any team member may steal this from me).
,
Sep 2
No objection. Thanks!
,
Sep 21
Any update on this?
,
Sep 21
Haven't had time to look at this. I'll dedicate some time during makeitbetter week.
,
Oct 12
Took a look today. I'm trying to switch to JS, but blink checks for user gesture [1], and I haven't found a way to turn this off/mock this. Some questions I'd like to answer: 1. When DOMUtils flakes, is it because 'user gesture' is false? Or some other reason? 2. If I hardcode user-gesture to true, is JS just as flaky as DOMUtils, or is it viable? I can't get answers until tomorrow, because it can take hours to produce a flake locally... [1] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/dom/user_gesture_indicator.cc?l=131&rcl=eb28e7e34aba87013ba804e64faa214cce5caf94
,
Oct 12
Update on #2: I think JS is indeed less flaky (it passed 1000 consecutive runs).
,
Oct 15
,
Oct 17
I think I have a prototype which switches to JS, but it plumbs ExecuteJavaScriptWithUserGestureForTests() [1] to Java, which might have security concerns (although, we already plumb ExecuteJavaScriptForTests, so perhaps not much worse). I'm running this tonight to verify if this really fixes flakiness before proceeding. Alternatives: 1. We could try using TouchCommon#singleClickView(View v, int x, int y). This requires that we can get the X/Y coordinates for the custom fullscreen button--I'm not sure if we can. 2. We could plumb ExecuteJavaScriptWithUserGestureForTests to Java, but via a testonly build target. This means it won't be compiled into the product, and the linker might even strip the native method (assuming it's not called other places). This is probably "better" but involves quite a bit more work (jinsukkim@ attempted this in http://crrev/c/1203490, but was reverted). [1] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/content/public/browser/render_frame_host.h?l=191&rcl=c073209954ab8bd9893bbeeaa0ff9c526ed2d560
,
Oct 17
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04 commit 52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04 Author: Nate Fischer <ntfschr@chromium.org> Date: Wed Oct 17 22:45:14 2018 AW: fix and enable flaky test This enables testExitFullscreenEndsIfAppInvokesCallbackFromOnHideCustomView. This test flaked because DOMUtils was unreliable for clicking links. This CL swaps out DOMUtils for EvaluateJavaScriptWithUserGesture (since the relevant blink code requires user gesture and has no way to turn it off for testing). This plumbs EvaluateJavaScriptWithUserGesture to Java in a testonly target, so the Java method will not be present in production (and so this change should have no security implications). R=boliu@chromium.org --repeat=1000 \ --gtest_filter=AwContentsClientFullScreenTest#testExitFullscreenEndsIfAppInvokesCallbackFromOnHideCustomView Bug: 789306 Test: run_webview_instrumentation_test_apk --break-on-failure \ Change-Id: I4407ce0daa399fbb289d4c9d74e3d9b64bccfcbf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1286031 Reviewed-by: Bo <boliu@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Nate Fischer <ntfschr@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#600579} [modify] https://crrev.com/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04/android_webview/javatests/src/org/chromium/android_webview/test/AwContentsClientFullScreenTest.java [modify] https://crrev.com/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04/android_webview/javatests/src/org/chromium/android_webview/test/util/JSUtils.java [modify] https://crrev.com/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04/android_webview/test/BUILD.gn [modify] https://crrev.com/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04/content/public/test/android/javatests/src/org/chromium/content_public/browser/test/util/WebContentsUtils.java [modify] https://crrev.com/52c77521913da72057f84f159b21fc68c8808a04/content/public/test/android/web_contents_utils.cc
,
Oct 18
The following tests were all disabled around the same time: 1. testExitFullscreenEndsIfAppInvokesCallbackFromOnHideCustomView 2. testFullscreenForNonVideoElementIsSupportedInSoftwareMode 3. testPowerSaveBlockerIsTransferredToFullscreen I'll enable the other 2 locally and look for flakes.
,
Oct 19
^ The other two also seem improved, so I've sent http://crrev/c/1290142 for review. After that lands, we can probably close this out.
,
Oct 22
Hmmm try-flakes seems to be deprecated. I'm trying to search for any flakes in the new replacement, and (as best as I can determine) it's flake-free. Given that, I'm going to land the CL to reenable the other tests. URL is https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/ranked-flakes?test_filter=AwContentsClientFullScreenTest
,
Oct 22
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/96c0be24a293ae3dd08592cfe6496729cd2636f9 commit 96c0be24a293ae3dd08592cfe6496729cd2636f9 Author: Nate Fischer <ntfschr@chromium.org> Date: Mon Oct 22 18:00:26 2018 AW: enable more tests No change to production logic. This enables 2 tests which were previously disabled due to flakiness. The flakiness was fixed in http://crrev/c/1286031, and these appear safe to enable: * testFullscreenForNonVideoElementIsSupportedInSoftwareMode * testPowerSaveBlockerIsTransferredToFullscreen This also cleans up annotations on other disabled tests. It's sufficient to mark disabled tests as "@DisabledTest" without commenting out other annotations. It's helpful to actually leave these annotations uncommented, because it makes enabling the test a one-line change. Bug: 789306 Test: run_webview_instrumentation_test_apk \ Test: --gtest_filter=AwContentsClientFullScreenTest#* \ Test: --repeat=1000 Change-Id: I497718177d086c46e1553e1f365b23b27de760e4 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1290142 Reviewed-by: Bo <boliu@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Nate Fischer <ntfschr@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#601647} [modify] https://crrev.com/96c0be24a293ae3dd08592cfe6496729cd2636f9/android_webview/javatests/src/org/chromium/android_webview/test/AwContentsClientFullScreenTest.java
,
Oct 22
I'll follow up end of this week and look for flakes again. Otherwise, I think this is fixed.
,
Oct 22
[Auto-generated comment by a script] We noticed that this issue is targeted for M-71; it appears the fix may have landed after branch point, meaning a merge might be required. Please confirm if a merge is required here - if so add Merge-Request-71 label, otherwise remove Merge-TBD label. Thanks.
,
Oct 22
These tests were flaky because of a bad testonly dependency, not because of a product defect. Therefore, no merge necessary.
,
Oct 26
The NextAction date has arrived: 2018-10-26
,
Oct 26
Looks like the changes stuck! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by boliu@chromium.org
, Nov 28 2017