It looks like TabRestoreTest.RestoreTabWithSpecialURL has a flaky failure on "Linux Chromium OS ASan LSan Tests (1)".

This test seems to flake very rarely. I see one failure in the past 200 runs now from this test. I had also noted a failure in  https://crbug.com/742623#c12 . I didn't see any failures from TabRestoreTest.RestoreTabWithSpecialURL at later dates and assumed the test was fixed.

Here is the failing run:

https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.memory/builders/Linux%20Chromium%20OS%20ASan%20LSan%20Tests%20%281%29/builds/24926

Here is the relevant part of the logs for the leak (which is truncated and pretty useless):

<truncated (513094 bytes)>
lib/connector.cc:469:10
    #16 0x116a1523 in mojo::Connector::OnHandleReadyInternal(unsigned int) mojo/public/cpp/bindings/lib/connector.cc:374:3
    #17 0x7960e1f in Run base/callback.h:94:12
    #18 0x7960e1f in mojo::SimpleWatcher::DiscardReadyState(base::RepeatingCallback<void (unsigned int)> const&, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState const&) mojo/public/cpp/system/simple_watcher.h:193
    #19 0x11717b4f in Run base/callback.h:94:12
    #20 0x11717b4f in mojo::SimpleWatcher::OnHandleReady(int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState const&) mojo/public/cpp/system/simple_watcher.cc:276
    #21 0x11718d84 in Invoke<const base::WeakPtr<mojo::SimpleWatcher> &, const int &, const unsigned int &, const mojo::HandleSignalsState &> base/bind_internal.h:194:12
    #22 0x11718d84 in MakeItSo<void (mojo::SimpleWatcher::*const &)(int, unsigned int, const mojo::HandleSignalsState &), const base::WeakPtr<mojo::SimpleWatcher> &, const int &, const unsigned int &, const mojo::HandleSignalsState &> base/bind_internal.h:297
    #23 0x11718d84 in void base::internal::Invoker<base::internal::BindState<void (mojo::SimpleWatcher::*)(int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState const&), base::WeakPtr<mojo::SimpleWatcher>, int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState>, void ()>::RunImpl<void (mojo::SimpleWatcher::* const&)(int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState const&), std::__1::tuple<base::WeakPtr<mojo::SimpleWatcher>, int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState> const&, 0ul, 1ul, 2ul, 3ul>(void (mojo::SimpleWatcher::* const&)(int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState const&), std::__1::tuple<base::WeakPtr<mojo::SimpleWatcher>, int, unsigned int, mojo::HandleSignalsState> const&, std::__1::integer_sequence<unsigned long, 0ul, 1ul, 2ul, 3ul>) base/bind_internal.h:351
    #24 0xd242eee in Run base/callback.h:65:12
    #25 0xd242eee in base::debug::TaskAnnotator::RunTask(char const*, base::PendingTask*) base/debug/task_annotator.cc:57
    #26 0xcaae93f in blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager::ProcessTaskFromWorkQueue(blink::scheduler::internal::WorkQueue*, bool, blink::scheduler::LazyNow, base::TimeTicks*) third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/base/task_queue_manager.cc:522:19
    #27 0xcaa7218 in blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager::DoWork(bool) third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/base/task_queue_manager.cc:313:13
    #28 0xcab5e3e in Invoke<const base::WeakPtr<blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager> &, const bool &> base/bind_internal.h:194:12
    #29 0xcab5e3e in MakeItSo<void (blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager::*const &)(bool), const base::WeakPtr<blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager> &, const bool &> base/bind_internal.h:297
    #30 0xcab5e3e in RunImpl<void (blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager::*const &)(bool), const std::__1::tuple<base::WeakPtr<blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager>, bool> &, 0, 1> base/bind_internal.h:351
    #31 0xcab5e3e in base::internal::Invoker<base::internal::BindState<void (blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager::*)(bool), base::WeakPtr<blink::scheduler::TaskQueueManager>, bool>, void ()>::Run(base::internal::BindStateBase*) base/bind_internal.h:333
    #32 0xd242eee in Run base/callback.h:65:12
    #33 0xd242eee in base::debug::TaskAnnotator::RunTask(char const*, base::PendingTask*) base/debug/task_annotator.cc:57
    #34 0xd4cafde in base::internal::IncomingTaskQueue::RunTask(base::PendingTask*) base/message_loop/incoming_task_queue.cc:128:19
    #35 0xd2bf6fc in base::MessageLoop::RunTask(base::PendingTask*) base/message_loop/message_loop.cc:394:25
    #36 0xd2c02cc in base::MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask(base::PendingTask) base/message_loop/message_loop.cc:406:5
    #37 0xd2c0c23 in base::MessageLoop::DoWork() base/message_loop/message_loop.cc:450:16
    #38 0xd2c5912 in base::MessagePumpDefault::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) base/message_loop/message_pump_default.cc:37:31

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 211569 byte(s) leaked in 1171 allocation(s).

+sky for help with triage since you're the only one in the chrome/browser/sessions/OWNERS file. It doesn't look like anyone has modified the test in years at this point. Any ideas?