Abrt in mojo::edk::NodeChannel::WriteChannelMessage |
|||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6072586395189248 Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified Job Type: linux_tsan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Abrt Crash Address: 0x03e900005ff1 Crash State: mojo::edk::NodeChannel::WriteChannelMessage mojo::edk::NodeChannel::SendChannelMessage mojo::edk::NodeController::SendPeerEvent Sanitizer: thread (TSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_tsan_chrome_mp&range=518240:518474 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6072586395189248 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Nov 26 2017
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files. If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
,
Nov 27 2017
,
Nov 27 2017
Appears to be the CHECK added in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/666082 firing, i.e. that something tries to send a message that is too-large.
,
Nov 27 2017
Looks like coincidence that this showed up when it did; I'm able to trivially repro with the Reproducer Testcase, even after reverting the PlatformHandle changes.
,
Mar 23 2018
,
Mar 31 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 547166:547168. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6072586395189248 Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified Job Type: linux_tsan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: message->data_num_bytes() < GetConfiguration().max_message_num_bytes in node_cha mojo::edk::NodeChannel::WriteChannelMessage mojo::edk::NodeChannel::SendChannelMessage Sanitizer: thread (TSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_tsan_chrome_mp&range=518240:518474 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_tsan_chrome_mp&range=547166:547168 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6072586395189248 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Mar 31 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 6072586395189248 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Nov 26 2017Owner: w...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)