All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=788489

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=dc369ba73afd37f524693432ac7ccbacbb6e641d5e56c6ecb6b1a81e39935be7


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
win-high-dpi

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961961392608850784

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_ebay

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@517800      23382894 +- 4878173      21      good
chromium@517862      23158199 +- 4166122      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.ebay system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961961392608850784


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection