Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
30.7% regression in blink_perf.layout at 518183:518253 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962037941858782704
,
Dec 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961047740790898608
,
Dec 5 2017
Kicked new bisect.
,
Dec 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : floats_100_100/floats_100_100 Revision Result N chromium@518182 561.604 +- 58.5182 21 good chromium@518253 624.237 +- 781.302 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8961047740790898608 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 22 2018
These metrics just look bimodal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 24 2017