Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
38.6% regression in blink_perf.layout at 518183:518253 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962039195074264192
,
Nov 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: TIMEOUT The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: f1c1cd3f721af72be0aee8b5201000ffd6b522a2 bad_revision : 1112a3a1a8ba9eedecf51ffeefb2990caad27070 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables/multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables Change : 3.58% | 48.7177096636 -> 50.4601871729 Revision Result N chromium@518182 48.7177 +- 0.802788 6 good chromium@518218 48.9911 +- 0.871339 6 good chromium@518236 50.0187 +- 1.70603 9 bad chromium@518253 50.4602 +- 0.788421 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962039195074264192 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 22 2018
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 24 2017