Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
45.8%-366.1% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 514475:514710 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962312073167163680
,
Nov 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly
Bisect was aborted with the following:
Step('Check bisect finished on revision chromium@514641.fetch file 2f5601bcf02b54c5b68b10520223a993469abd42:DEPS') failed with return_code 1
Bisect Details
Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
Metric : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll
Revision Result N
chromium@514611 38.2476 +- 59.1012 14 good
chromium@514636 41.8055 +- 55.0385 14 good
chromium@514640 41.9802 +- 55.7685 9 good
chromium@514641 49.6377 +- 31.363 9 good
chromium@514642 76.6034 +- 65.4757 9 bad
chromium@514643 84.3955 +- 11.2623 6 bad
chromium@514649 67.9041 +- 127.057 21 bad
chromium@514661 69.5142 +- 100.726 14 bad
chromium@514710 68.813 +- 100.382 14 bad
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
More information on addressing performance regressions:
http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Debug information about this bisect:
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962312073167163680
For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962235628159361200
,
Nov 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ulan Degenbaev Commit : 6bb1d47e6e82f75ead36cdab209afc5dafa8329c Date : Tue Nov 07 13:11:10 2017 Subject: [heap] Re-enable concurrent marking. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_instagram Change : 55.61% | 71.4211666667 -> 111.139666667 Revision Result N chromium@514533 71.4212 +- 9.60797 6 good chromium@514588 65.3942 +- 37.0616 6 good chromium@514616 73.2525 +- 7.9254 6 good chromium@514630 74.112 +- 6.46166 6 good chromium@514637 70.2515 +- 7.24476 6 good chromium@514640 71.6755 +- 8.48655 6 good chromium@514641 74.3308 +- 4.99465 6 good chromium@514641,v8@67d543ec31 74.4882 +- 13.1025 6 good chromium@514641,v8@6bb1d47e6e 114.329 +- 5.17608 6 bad <-- chromium@514641,v8@ac0661b358 113.663 +- 3.77887 6 bad chromium@514641,v8@80cb266c75 112.386 +- 8.58561 6 bad chromium@514642 114.172 +- 6.98079 6 bad chromium@514643 111.14 +- 6.76137 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962235628159361200 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 21 2017