Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.5%-69% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 515381:515525 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962312672075867504
,
Nov 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_media/browse_media_flickr_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@515395 6.21281 +- 9.25389 21 good chromium@515492 6.35024 +- 11.4976 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.flickr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962312672075867504 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 7
This regression has been open for half a year. It's not very actionable and the regression has been in all Chrome user's hands for months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 21 2017